While ChatGPT has nearly a fifth of Google’s query volume, people use the platforms in different ways.
I wanted to see how ChatGPT compared to Google, not just on the total number of searches, but also searches where they compete with Google, how much traffic they send to websites, and the CTR differences in the systems.
Let’s dig in.
I’ve seen some studies that used those numbers for comparison, but I don’t agree with them. Google does more than just search. There are tools for calculations, translation, and more which are included in other categories in the study. Even things like coding help are categorized differently, but devs have been searching issues on Google (and Stack Overflow) for many years.
For example, we see hundreds of millions of searches every month for people looking to translate things on Google.

Looking at their examples, I would classify 65% of the searches on ChatGPT as things that were traditionally searched on Google. This is higher than what the researchers classified, but I have more access to data on what people search than they did.
| Category | % of ChatGPT Usage | ChatGPT Daily Volume | % of Google’s Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure Search (facts, products, recipes) | 24.0% | 600 million | 4.38% |
| Asking Intent (search + advice) | 51.6% | 1.29 billion | 9.42% |
| My Search Classification (things people traditionally searched on Google) | 65.0% | 1.625 billion | 11.86% |
ChatGPT gets ~12% of the search volume of Google for things people have traditionally searched for on Google. For some comparison, it’s estimated that Bing gets 1.2 billion searches a day. ChatGPT has surpassed Bing in search!
If we look at the traffic coming to websites, Google sends 190x more traffic to websites than ChatGPT. Google makes up nearly 40% of traffic to websites and ChatGPT just 0.21%.

This is where the platforms diverge completely.
I ran the numbers for the different classifications, but again I believe that my search classification is more accurate than those from the paper. I came up with ChatGPT having a 96% lower CTR than Google.
Calculation method: Estimated CTR = (Traffic Share % / Daily Queries in billions) × 10
| Platform/Category | Daily Queries | Traffic Share | Estimated CTR | CTR vs Google |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.7 billion | 39.98% | 29.2% | Baseline | |
| ChatGPT (Pure Search) | 600 million | 0.21% | 3.5% | 88% lower |
| ChatGPT (Asking Intent) | 1.29 billion | 0.21% | 1.6% | 94% lower |
| ChatGPT (My Search Classification) | 1.625 billion | 0.21% | 1.3% | 96% lower |
| ChatGPT (All Usage) | 2.5 billion | 0.21% | 0.84% | 97% lower |
Final thoughts
Google remains the dominant search engine with 5.5x more daily activity. ChatGPT made headway into search in a short amount of time. They’ve passed longtime search rivals like Bing.
However, I’m not sure if website owners will accept the drop in traffic or if they will eventually push back on AI search.
Similar Posts

Accelerate Sustainability Targets with VMware
Hosting providers are becoming more competitive in their electricity consumption. This is measured by the amount of data centre power consumption versus how much of the total Kwh is being used by the actual computing power of the data centre, known as the PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness). At a recent customer supplier day I learnt…

The best products to sell online in 2025
Whether you’re starting your first business, looking for new products to sell, or launching your tenth brand, navigating the rapidly evolving world of ecommerce to sell products requires thorough research and a sharp focus on trends and strategies. Successful online businesses understand the importance of making informed decisions at every step of the research and…
Release Day: The Drupal Recipes API
We recently completed a new set of tutorials covering the Drupal Recipe API. My interest in Drupal recipes began while I was working on documentation for the Drupal CMS User Guide, which relies heavily on recipes to provide its features. Drupal CMS is just Drupal core plus a curated set of contributed modules, preconfigured to…

We Spent >$1 Million Sponsoring Creators. Here’s What We Learned About B2B Influencer Marketing
We’ve spent over one million dollars and sponsored hundreds of creators, educators, and influencers, even including big names like Linus Tech Tips and Lenny Rachitsky: All of this work is done by our tireless Partnerships Manager, Igor Gorbenko. I spoke to him to extract everything he learned about partnerships. sponsored podcasts, we spent $14,000 on…

The Long-Form Content Illusion: Why Longer Content Isn’t Better
You’re looking for this article because you think long-form content works right? Or at least that’s what you’ve heard from many marketers. You might even have seen it for yourself. You’re trying to make a simple pasta dish (like aglio e olio) but you have to scroll through a piece that’s thousands of words long,…

Good SEO Plus Lazy Marketing Won’t Cut It Anymore
SEO is a playground for creative, scrappy problem-solvers. But today, it’s often reduced to a formula: plug keywords into an AI tool. Run a cookie-cutter checklist to create content. Build links. Hope traffic rolls in. That used to work. But with AI-powered search on the rise, the era of SEOs as technicians is fading, and the…





